Providing workers' compensation coverage for your employees is a complex yet critical responsibility. Partnering with a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) can make managing your workers' comp program easier, but it's important to understand how PEO plans work. This guide will outline everything you need to know about PEO workers' compensation to evaluate if it's the right choice for your company.
A Professional Employer Organization (PEO) provides outsourced HR services to small and mid-sized businesses. The PEO contracts with client companies to take over many of the complex employment responsibilities and compliance duties that come with having employees. This frees up the client organization to focus on core business operations.
When partnering with a PEO, the client company enters a co-employment arrangement. The PEO becomes the employer of record and takes on crucial HR tasks like payroll, benefits management, risk and safety programs, workers’ compensation, and more. However, the client company maintains direction over the day-to-day job duties and functions of its workforce. Essentially, the PEO handles the “back office” while clients manage the “front office.”
When a company partners with a PEO, one of the key services provided is securing workers' compensation insurance. As the co-employer, the PEO takes responsibility for maintaining workers' comp coverage on behalf of the client organization. This means purchasing the insurance policy, paying the premiums, handling compliance paperwork, and managing any claims that arise.
The PEO becomes the named insured on the workers' comp policy and acts as the primary administrator of the program. However, the coverage extends to the client company's employees based on the co-employment arrangement. The PEO leverages economies of scale across its entire client base to obtain group discounts and more competitive rates from insurance carriers. This cost efficiency is passed down to individual clients.
In short, PEOs provide turnkey workers’ compensation services so smaller companies can benefit from the buying power and specialized expertise of a larger, HR-focused provider. With the PEO handling the program, clients don't have to navigate the complex web of regulations and paperwork on their own.
Now that we’ve reviewed how PEO arrangements work specifically for workers’ comp, it’s important to understand how these plans differ from traditional coverage.
There are a few key differences between obtaining workers' compensation coverage through a PEO compared to purchasing a standard insurance policy as an individual business.
With a traditional workers' comp policy, the company handles all administration internally. This includes shopping for plans, paying premiums, submitting payroll reports, managing compliance paperwork, overseeing claims and audits, coordinating return-to-work programs, and more. The business must build expertise across all those functions or pay additional service fees.
By contrast, PEO workers’ comp coverage bundles many of those services under one umbrella. The PEO leverages economies of scale to secure better insurance rates while also overseeing filings, paperwork, and claims management through their dedicated staff. Safety programs, workplace training initiatives, and back-to-work programs are all typically included as well. However, the convenience and expertise comes at an additional cost through the PEO’s fees.
In general, PEO plans provide full administrative support while traditional policies are self-managed. Determining what makes sense depends on the priorities, risk appetite, and budget of each unique organization. Now, let’s explore a few of the most common policy types issued under PEO arrangements.
When it comes to PEO workers' compensation policies, there are a few common types that provide coverage in different ways:
Master Policy: This is a standard workers' comp policy that lists the PEO as the primary policyholder. It covers all of the PEO's direct employees (if any) as well as the leased employees from multiple client companies.
Multiple Coordinated Policy (MCP): Involves separate coordinated policies - one for the PEO covering its own non-leased workers and one for each individual client company listing that business as the policyholder. Endorsements link the policies.
Multiple PEO Policies: Each client company has its own distinct workers' comp policy, but the named insured on every policy is the PEO. The coverage only applies to that specific client's employees leased through the PEO.
Understanding the variations in PEO-issued workers’ comp policies is important when evaluating partners. Be sure to ask about policy structure and coordination practices to find the best fit. Now let’s discuss an aspect many multi-state companies consider: Does one PEO plan cover different jurisdictions?
There are quite a few appealing benefits PEOs offer clients specifically related to workers’ compensation:
Lower Premiums - By aggregating small clients into large groups, PEOs gain economies of scale that enable considerable discounts on insurance rates. Those savings get passed down to each member company. Because you join the PEO’s pre-existing program, you don’t have to pay an upfront deposit and can instead work on a “pay as you go” schedule.
Administrative Relief - As co-employer, the PEO wholly owns compliance, payroll filings, paperwork, audits, and general program management based on established expertise and resources. This alleviates major burdens for clients lacking infrastructure.
Proactive Safety - Many PEOs conduct worksite safety assessments, risk analyses, OSHA-compliance reviews and employee training initiatives aimed at identifying and mitigating hazards to reduce incidents. Preventing claims allows for even lower costs over time.
Injury & Claims Management - Given PEOs handle thousands of workers’ comp claims every year, they become specialized at efficiently guiding cases to reasonable conclusions, containing expenses on negative outcomes. Their control over the process also prevents potential fraud.
Getting access to these PEO benefits can drive immense savings.
While PEOs offer many valuable services related to workers’ compensation programs, there are some potential drawbacks to consider as well:
Loss of Control - By handing program management to an outside provider, clients cede a certain level of oversight and autonomy. The PEO assumes responsibility for directing safety interventions, managing workplace incidents, coordinating with carriers, and more. Some companies are uncomfortable relying on an intermediary for such crucial risk-related functions.
Data & Transition Issues - If the PEO relationship ends abruptly at any point, clients may struggle resuming self-directed workers’ comp administration since recent data and history accompanies the PEO. Gaps in coverage could occur as standalone policies are re-established too.
Diminished Experience Impacts - PEOs pool many small clients under common policies, blending all their data. This dilutes the positive or negative statistical influence any single company has over its rates. Loss run history transfers back if a member leaves the PEO, but market dynamics differ by state.
As with any partnership, both the advantages and risks matter. So, is entrusting workers’ comp to a PEO the right call? Let’s discuss how firms can weigh their options.
Determining if shifting your workers' compensation program to a PEO makes sense requires carefully weighing several factors:
1. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Conduct a detailed cost analysis projecting total expenses of a PEO plan compared to self-managing coverage in-house. PEO fees, rate discounts, administrative savings, and risk mitigation positives and negatives should all be quantified. Compare if projected long-term costs are lower or higher with a partner.
2. Safety & Compliance Capabilities: Audit whether your current human resources staff has the skills, bandwidth and infrastructure to match a PEO's risk management rigor without it. Evaluating accident causes, pinpointing safety gaps, liaising with adjustors, navigating regulations and filings add up. Less capable teams drain productivity through distracted effort.
3. Claims Management Proficiency: Managing incidents decisively to minimize expenses requires experience many smaller companies lack. PEOs handle thousands annually, progressing cases optimally. Compare your aptitude guiding injured workers through care, identifying fraud, liaising with doctors, and facilitating modified duty accommodations.
4. Risk Tolerance & Priority Tradeoffs: Partnering reduces program oversight but enables cost efficiency. Evaluate comfort relinquishing control over processes, data, transitions etc. If savings outweigh dependence on an intermediary administering a critical business function, PEO arrangements often merit consideration.
Getting clarity on all these dynamics through an unbiased lens is essential before pursuing partnership. The decision carries weighty pros and cons requiring due diligence.
Key Takeaways
Deciding whether to leverage a Professional Employer Organization for your workers’ compensation needs is complex, carrying meaningful tradeoffs between cost efficiency gained and autonomy relinquished over this crucial program. But by objectively weighing all the priority factors we outlined from administration bandwidth to risk tolerance analysis, clarity emerges on what arrangement best fits your unique organization.
Some will determine the advantages of accessing group discounts and specialized expertise outweigh extra fees and dependence on an intermediary. Others may prize maintaining oversight and firsthand data enough to justify self-managed coverage. Every journey scaling efficient, resilient human capital infrastructure contains twists, so continue evaluating each option with clear heads.
Though the path forward may still seem foggy now, staying resolute while drawing on resources like this guide will reveal the role, if any, PEO partnerships can play advancing your workforce risk management. The key is asking the right questions to illuminate what’s truly best long-term for safeguarding your people and fiscal strength.